Jump to content
Join the POSCON Public Discord Server! ×

Nico

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Nico

  1. 3 hours ago, Andrew said:

    AJ

    KPHL

    My favorite FS experience is to fly online in a group flight with @Nico, but instead of flying a commercial airliner, fly fast jets when all he can fly is a clunky 737. It annoys him a lot ROFL!

    i don't like flying with you. Between you fighter jets and your helicopters I lose my mind!

  2. Im not a real pilot, but I can share my 2 cents about this. 

    When landing with very strong headwinds, and high temperatures, your wind correction values to the Vref speed are a lot higher. Hence, you run into the speed limitations of the high flap settings. In a 738-800, normal landing config is Flaps 30/40. However, should you face strong headwinds (i.e. 30ktG45kt), you are at the maximum recommended wind correction of VREF + 20 kts. At this speed, you will be in the red during F30 and F40. So an abnormal F15 might be the case. 

     

    So you were right in your thinking. Now if a RW pilot wants to come here and totally destroy my answer and shed sone light.... please do!

    Nico

    • Thanks 2
  3. On behalf of the ADX team I want to welcome you to what I’m confident will become a great resource; the new ADX Forum. 

    I encourage every registered user to share some basic information about yourself so we can all get to know each other and collaborate with each other  

    I suggest a great place to start would be your first name, the 4-letter code of your closest international airport, and some fun facts about your simming experience (such as favorite scenery, favorite flight, preferred aircraft, etc)  

    Let me start!

    Nico

    KLGA

    I love the visual into rw 15 at Paro (VQPR), expressway visual rw 31 Into KLGA. 

    I fly a full motion 737-800 simulator. And I love every minute of it!

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. Something tells me you already know the answer to this.... but i waste my time.... why not?

    if you are given a vector after wheels up when you filed for an RNAV procedure, this will force you to depart on HDG hold mode and not LNAV. There is ussualy a reason for the vectors (traffic and separation being the most important) more often than not, you will be turned direct a waypoint in the SiD and told to resume the SID. 

    Nico

  5. On 12/12/2017 at 10:29 PM, Andrew said:

    No, it is not fair to expect that one controller would need a more complete readback than the other. Let THEM tell you whether they want a shortened readback. It's not really for the pilot to decide.

    PDC should be used where it is available in the real world; however, on network's such as VATSIM, there is not clear standardized model or automated process for it. We will be solving this issue on POSCON.

    Great! Will you also be solving the issue of shorter readbacks (i.e. sqw only) in poscon?

  6. 3 hours ago, Andrew said:

    Full readbacks are always expected unless ATC advises otherwise. If you want to shorten your readback, at the very least give us your destination, departure procedure, initial altitude, and squawk code. Altitude being the MOST important of all.

    Example: "Cleared to La Guardia, Philadelphia Two departure, maintain 5000, squawk 3301."

    The controller often times has no clue whether you are familiar with the route or not, and frankly it doesn't really matter. In the airline world we act as though it is our first time flying a route every time, regardless of the fact it may be our 1000th time. This is to prevent a hazard called "expectation bias" which could trap you if something changes from what you expect on the 1001th time you fly that route.

    Expectation bias, that is a good one. I guess that is the reason why you perform checklists and briefinds even if it is your 1000th time performing the same procedure. 

     

    Is it fair to expect that you need a more complete readback to a CLR_DEL than a CTR controller when FLYING ONLINE?

    also, whats the deal with PDC? And why havent all facilities adopted this procedure? It seems to be a big time saver

  7. Ahora si mis amigos Colombianos, como les prometi en nuestra conversacion de TS, aca tenemos la plataforma para estanlecer cada ARTCC y cualquier pregunta que tengan por favor usen este medio para contactarnos. Y no se olviden de avisarle a los miembros de Vatsim Colombia que se registren en este foro ya que cuanto mas miembros tenga, mas recursos van a recibir para formalizar el grupo antes del lanzamiento de POSCON. 

     

    nico

  8. I fly online all the time, and whenever i file a flight plan (assuming it was sourced from flightaware or the preferred route database), after my clearance was given Exactly as i filed it, i read back the transponder code and my call sign. That’s it. I figure it saves a controller’s time. 

     

    Is this correct? Do controllers online appreciate this or prefer a full readback?

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines.