Jump to content

aeroniemi

Members
  • Content Count

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

aeroniemi last won the day on January 30

aeroniemi had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

11 Good

About aeroniemi

  • Rank
    Informed Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. On VATSIM, at least from the point of view of the major airports, they mostly don't fall in line with the amount of traffic that you actually get - EGKK and EGCC have way more traffic than LHBP. It could definitely be done better with some thinking
  2. See here : https://1drv.ms/b/s!AnHRD9JOJzhvjaAA_27XZGFPH2To2A
  3. I've put a oceanic procedures document in the downloads sector, Are you aiming for something like that?
  4. Have a look at https://padlet.com/aeroniemi/posconuksop i've collated the things i've worked on already, feel free to add what you've done (columns - other facilities, rows - other data and docs)
  5. I'd assume it would be, as it is in reality, but the details would be worked out closer to the time of implementation
  6. I think the best method here is to come up with a set of sections that need to exist for all airports in the UK, and then from that add extra sections as require at airports such as EGKK and EGLL. Maybe we should make some sort of shared thing to confer on these plans (i'll see what I can come up with), and allow people to add and edit the info that they know
  7. Gibraltar is a strange one, as far as i'm aware, the airport is owned by the MoD, but serves primerally civilian traffic, and has civilian controllers on contract through the standard civil UK atc authority, NATS
  8. The UK has quite a few airports that are not within "Britain" as such, like LXGB Gibraltar, LCRA Akrotiri, EGYP Mount Pleasant, FHSH St Helena etc. What would the intended status be of these sites from a controlling perspective; would they fall under a UK division, or the local one, such as Cyprus for LCRA? Additionally, one of the complaints i've been informed of from VATSIM is that controllers from the area around one of these fields, such as cypriot or Spanish controllers find it difficult to get approved on these positions, in part due to a different system, although I can assume other factors are present.
  9. It's dependent on what's included in the clearance as read by the controller, and where in the world you are: In UK airports one will generally get "cleared to [airport] via [sid], initial climb [as appropriate, often not included if published], squawk. " It would then be required that you read all of those components back, and the controller will ask you again for it should you not reply. Under my VATSIM experience in the DANUBE FAB (BG/RO/MD), it'd be required to read back at minimum sq. code, altitude, sid and QNH (as given at clearance)
  10. According to the Letter to users (11/15/17) The aim is to have beta around, or slightly after FSExpo in June 2018
  11. Eurocontrol is simply a association to make coordination between ANSPs work better, without having much say over what these ANSPs in each country do; more like ICAO than a divisional area
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines.