Jump to content
Join the POSCON Public Discord Server! ×

aeroniemi

Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by aeroniemi

  1. A ridiculously busy event is great, but ground is where it's at; so much more exciting than APP or enroute. I'm from SE England, I guess EGKK or EGLC is the nearest airport, but not by UK scale really - they're each 70+km away, but still the closest commercial fields. I generally fly some commercial plane to airports with RNAV/circling approaches; deliberately choosing the difficult option for the controllers (after all, that's what they're there for right?)

  2. I think the controller client would benefit from some kind of anti-aliasing, as ES looks horrible on higher resolution screens - on that note, UI scaling, both for the pop-up windows and the top bar/dropdowns, as even on my 4k laptop not everything fits on the screen

  3. It's dependent on what's included in the clearance as read by the controller, and where in the world you are:

    In UK airports one will generally get "cleared to [airport] via [sid], initial climb [as appropriate, often not included if published], squawk. "

    It would then be required that you read all of those components back, and the controller will ask you again for it should you not reply.
    Under my VATSIM experience in the DANUBE FAB (BG/RO/MD), it'd be required to read back at minimum sq. code, altitude, sid and QNH (as given at clearance)

     

  4. Has any thoughts been taken to implementing CPDLC, both in the client, and working with developers to intergrate it into flight computers?

    I think that'd really be something that'd set it apart, and maybe even allow for computerised ATC over places like the atlantic, where CPDLC is used quite a bit

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines.