aeroniemi

A ridiculously busy event is great, but ground is where it's at; so much more exciting than APP or enroute. I'm from SE England, I guess EGKK or EGLC is the nearest airport, but not by UK scale really - they're each 70+km away, but still the closest commercial fields. I generally fly some commercial plane to airports with RNAV/circling approaches; deliberately choosing the difficult option for the controllers (after all, that's what they're there for right?)

A fat plugin in XP terms meant 32/64 bit and WIN/MAC/LIN (32 bit being a holdover from XP9, 64 bit added at 10.30, and 32 bit removed in 11.00)

I think the controller client would benefit from some kind of anti-aliasing, as ES looks horrible on higher resolution screens - on that note, UI scaling, both for the pop-up windows and the top bar/dropdowns, as even on my 4k laptop not everything fits on the screen

It's dependent on what's included in the clearance as read by the controller, and where in the world you are: In UK airports one will generally get "cleared to [airport] via [sid], initial climb [as appropriate, often not included if published], squawk. " It would then be required that you read all of those components back, and the controller will ask you again for it should you not reply. Under my VATSIM experience in the DANUBE FAB (BG/RO/MD), it'd be required to read back at minimum sq. code, altitude, sid and QNH (as given at clearance)

According to the Letter to users (11/15/17) The aim is to have beta around, or slightly after FSExpo in June 2018

Amazing, good enough to complain about the pilots (lack of) ability to stay on the centreline on takeoff, (and a tire blowout on landing?)

Has any thoughts been taken to implementing CPDLC, both in the client, and working with developers to intergrate it into flight computers? I think that'd really be something that'd set it apart, and maybe even allow for computerised ATC over places like the atlantic, where CPDLC is used quite a bit

Good choice of A320, I do love that feature! if it's web based, then I see little issue with that, but what would happen say if your web browser on your FS computer crashed, or you accidentally close the tab? would that lead to a disconnection?

Which flight simulators intend to be supported by the pilot client? Additionally, has anyone thought about VR, which is coming to X-Plane this winter, and available through things like flyinside on P3D/FSX/legacy simulators?

Eurocontrol is simply a association to make coordination between ANSPs work better, without having much say over what these ANSPs in each country do; more like ICAO than a divisional area

https://github.com/aeroniemi/ZoomDeclutter ; there's a compiled version in the releases area

Either that or I've spent too much time compiling a plugin to do it in euroscope

What does ECAC stand for/mean?

For X-Plane, we already have the Bluebell OBJ8 files which are pretty good

Having some definition for things appearing/disappearing at different zoom levels would be useful as an extension

I do love euroscope, but recently it's been rather short on developers - looks like you stole them here!

What's the case going to be with places like Europe, where ATC screens look nothing like those in the US?